oink
Alec Baldwin is the latest “victim” of self-inflicted speech act trauma. Unlike other white male celebrities such as Mel Gibson, Don Imus, and Michael Richards who recently have been pilloried for their thoughtless and harmful speech, Baldwin’s words originally were part a private speech act. 1 Another thing that distinguishes Baldwin’s words is that they do not contain racial epithets or formulate racist indictments.
Baldwin’s tantrum manifests the tensions between his frustration as a jilted parent, his use of the discursive conventions of an adolescent, and his judgement as a rational adult—all are present in his voicemail message to Ireland (his daughter). Unfortunately for Baldwin and his daughter, Baldwin’s frustrations are evident to the exact degree that his strategy is ineffective. Baldwin seeks on one level to cultivate empathy in his adolescent daughter by assuming the simultaneous roles of peer and parent. The probable results, however, are hurting/humiliating Ireland, vindicating Kim Basinger (Ireland’s mother and Baldwin’s ex-wife), and embarrassing (after the publicizing of the message) himself.
Yet, I can’t help but wonder what eleven-year-old would submit a voicemail delivered to her by her father to the public at large. Or was the dissemination of the private voicemail initiated by someone else? Whoever is responsible, the dissemination of the voicemail seems a vindictive act in some ways more characteristic of an adolescent than an adult. I am also somewhat embarrassed for Baldwin, but I don’t think his tantrum in and of itself is a sign that he is a bad parent (though he very well may be). I also suspect Ireland is nursing her hurt feelings. Basinger, for now, is keeping mum, which in the realm of public and judicial opinion is to her advantage.
As a cultural critic, what I’m most curious about are the various rhetorical strategies present in Baldwin’s voicemail which inchoately suggest that parenting is not merely a matter of rationality, but that it is a constellation governed by the gravitational forces of love, desire, vanity, and anger to name a few. I also find the message absurd and to this extent funny, even as I recognize that Baldwin’s vows to “straighten [her] ass out” could greatly distress an eleven-year-old girl, presuming, that is, she is in fact not “a rude, thoughtless, little pig.”
Comments
#1
Yes; Baldwin's conversation with his daughter was indeed private. CNN.com reports, however, that
What?! I admit that while Baldwin's message made me uncomfortable (though I also found its absurdity funny), restricting visitation rights because of this message is entirely the wrong thing to do. Parenting *is* "a constellation governed by the gravitational forces of love, desire, vanity, and anger", which is exactly why many of these emotional governances are performed privately. They are also the exact reasons why he should be able to see his daughter. The rational components in his statements are evident of that: now that he's gotten his burst of anger and frustration out of the way, he and Ireland potentially have the space to discuss the problem. Potentially.
And let's be honest here: what pre-teen isn't sometimes combative, uncooperative and yes, even piggy? Veruca Salt comes to mind. While Baldwin's outburst seems a bit over-the-top, and he admits that his anger was "directed at the wrong person", it is hard to imagine a daughter of two Hollywood stars *not* acting-out and being at times selfish, petty and, as is a common reaction to having divorced parents, manipulative of one against the other.
Posted by: mandy | April 27, 2007 10:19 AM